[vc_row disable_element=\”yes\”][vc_column][vc_column_text]A quarterly journal published by Intrepid Publishing, LLC. Journal of Independent Legal Theory (JILT) is a peer-reviews journal dedicated to disseminating significant results of scientific research that are comprehensive, groundbreaking and of fundamental importance to the scientific community. JILT has rigorous ethical standards. A prospective work published in this journal must exemplify these august tributes. The Author(s) must make compelling cases that it does. Journal articles will be published in a rolling format, so that when accepted for publication there will be a minimal time before the prospective article is published. When the journal is full (approximately ten articles or 100 pages upper limit per volume), then the next volume will be automatically opened.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column width=\”1/2\”][vc_btn title=\”Read Article Here\” link=\”url:http%3A%2F%2Fintrepidpublishingllc.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2023%2F06%2F1_Journal_of_Indepent_Legal_Theory_35_2023.pdf||target:%20_blank|\”][/vc_column][vc_column width=\”1/2\”][vc_btn title=\”Sumbission Guidelines\” link=\”url:http%3A%2F%2Fintrepidpublishingllc.com%2Fdemanding-the-impossible-national-association-of-african-american-owned-media-v-comcast-corp-and-the-future-of-contractual-discrimination-cases-under-the-civil-rights-act-of-1866%2Fdemanding-the-impossible-national-association-of-african-american-owned-media-v-comcast-corp-and-the-future-of-contractual-discrimination-cases-under-the-civil-rights-act-of-1866%2F|title:Sumbission%20Guidelines%20%E2%80%93%20DEMANDING%20THE%20IMPOSSIBLE||\”][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
TITLE OF ARTICLE :
THE ANALYTIC – SYNTHETIC DISTINCTION: REVISITED
AUTHOR(S) OF ARTICLE: Lynn E. Roberts III
This paper gives a historic account of the Analytic-synthetic distinction, which is clear in many places. This paper will highlight the evolution of the conceptual problems caused in linguistics known as the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction, define and distinguish analytic statements from synthetic statements, highlight the most compelling arguments for and against such distinctions, from John Locke, Immanuel Kant, Gotlob Frege, W.V Quine, all the way to the most relevant and current arguments posed by H.P. Grice and Peter F. Strawson. Near the end of this paper, the author will draw some unique conclusions and make some points from the author’s own understanding
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]